You say Kurt Munger image samples are not to be trusted can you link to your own library of photos taken with the Minolta 100-200 to support your claims? Nowadays I mostly shoot a pocket Canon with CHDK. When captured at f/2.0, the images take full advantage of both compression and extreme shallow depth-of-field to yield a beautiful, dreamy aesthetic. So long as you're careful not to break the plastic lens mount, this is an extraordinary lens. You don't expect them to use crappy lenses then do you? Be careful not to bang the lens, in which case you might break off the mount, but I've never broken any of my plastic mount lenses. It certainly performance respectably given its age. The VR (Vibration Reduction) system has a 4-stop effectiveness and can be a real shot-saver, considering that Nikon DSLRs have no in-body stabilization. If i decide to move up to full frame cameras this year, it and my X-H1 will be the only things i keep maybe the 14mm and the 35mm too not a huge fan of Fuji's wider zooms, though (not always for optical reasons). For a full list of the technical specifications please refer to the product manual. See also Crop Factor. Vibration will cause it to creep to more telephoto settings over time though, so you'll likely want to make use of the zoom lock when carrying it for extended periods. That is, you should be able to shoot at shutter speeds four times slower than whatever level you need to get sharp handheld shots without VR. VR can't stop VR II (shown collapsed (gets longer as zoomed), DX coverage only, 52mm filters, 10.4 oz./296g, 3.6'/1.1m close focus). As with the autofocus system, the 7-blade aperture diaphragm is controlled mechanically by Nikons conventional lever, further extending compatibility with older cameras. @Raynaud although the Sony 55-210 is not as good (great) as my FE70-300G, I used it on my Sony 5T for many years, and it did a decent job for me.https://grob.smugmug.com/5T/In good light, for the size, weight, price, it got me interested in MILC's. Click on the image you want to know more about. HomeDonateNewSearchGalleryReviewsHow-ToBooksLinksWorkshops AboutContact, Nikon (And again, recent versions of Photoshop make it fairly easy to correct even significant amounts of geometric distortion.). lenses. The 16-55 is the only lens I've had for a long time before picking up the 90 and a cheap 25mm prime. Even in this extreme case (I couldn't look through the finder the direct view of the sun was so blinding), there isn't much to see in this worst-case sample. The zoom range is well spaced, Also what adapter do you suggest people use (I'm assuming you are using a camera with a native A-mount like the Sony A77). Nikon 200mm f/4 IF-ED lens | sec at /4.5. This tiny plastic lens have super optic design. Furthermore, the Minolta has no image stabilization which is a deal killer for most people looking for a telephoto lens. It takes 52mm filters, Nikon's standard since 1959, and you can stack a few of them at any focal length without any vignetting. Sample pictures taken with Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED. 19 March 2019, 27 March 2017, 05 January 2015, 19 March 2015, Photoshop's A gallery of 40 sample images taken with the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55 . Dimensions: 71x83mm DX: Works only on DX (small sensor) digital cameras. The other option would be the new Tamron FE, but we went up to 1,000 and lost OSS . My A6500 has ibis, but it cannot deal with 270mm equiv. AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor ED 55-200mm F4-5.6G, Nikon Authorized Dealers - Sport Optics (PDF), Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information. This issue may be better on modern Nikon cameras. Go buy the overpriced native glass if you want this lens looks pretty soft to my eyes. Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II review This is what the last users has tried to match. I had to exaggerate this by shooting gray targets and showing them against a gray background to make it look this bad: Nikon 55-200mm VR II falloff, no vignette correction. Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6 G ED | Cameralabs nikon's small telezoom wonder! I may have made the wrong choice. This 3.6x zoom, designed exclusively for use with Nikons DX-format D-SLR cameras, features Nikons VR (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization and is perfect for portraits and action. Something went wrong. The Fuji is still sharper IMO as the NIkon 55-200 isn't all that sharp according to all my testing. With a real improvement in optical characteristics from its predecessor design and the addition of VR image stabilization technology, you can't do much better for the price. Each image has information with which camera and settings it was shot with. Another happy discovery was that this lens is an internal focus design, so there's no rotation of the front element/filter threads during focusing, nor during zooming for that matter. A host of Nikon lens technologies offer greater shooting opportunities, even in trying conditions, so you can capture images you never imagined possible. When I read the title, the first thing I thought was "has Fuji come out with (yet) another lens?" - Nikon 105mm 2.5 ai 130$ Sony Xperia 1 IV Review. School; Cameras; Lenses; Compare; Compatibility; More. For professional sports and action, the $600 70-300mm Of course those extras don't matter to many people, but they *do* matter to others. The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II lens is a retractable telephoto zoom lens for Nikon cropped-sensor DSLR cameras. Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. This technology converts traveling waves into rotational energy to focus the optics. So there I ended up with a 55-200 vr and a sb-600 to complement my sb-800 for the same amount. Stop living in the past. I respectfully disagree with your assessment that the Minolta is "way sharper." I just bought a macro extension tube a week ago. Please keep your contributions constructive and civil. Stopped down to f/8, both lenses perform well, but the Nikon is still sharper across the frame; at the telephoto end, the Nikon is a fairly uniform 2 blur units across the frame, while the Tamron is sharper at the center, but hits highs of 4 blur units in the corners. Can you explain your comment. See Nikon Lens Compatibility for details with your camera. While fairly solid-feeling, the all-plastic construction makes the 55-200mm VR light enough that it balanced very nicely on our D200 test body and isn't too unwieldy, even on smaller bodies like the D40 and D40x. View Sample Photos (View in a lightbox) . Sharpness drops off noticeably at 200mm but still pretty good at f/8. Click on the image description for image and full details. The review does not tie up with my findings, so either his method is flawed or he has a bad copy of the lens. Nikon Authorized Dealers - Sport Optics (PDF), Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information. (purchased for $260), reviewed November 6th, 2008 The AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED is the only entry level VR lens at a very affordable price. At least this sample gallery has the merit of existing. Yes I did upload a shot at 100mm F5.6 I've shot it on FF and APS-C and his results at 100mm have no bearing at all to the lens I have with me. This is a tiny, sharp, great handling and lightweight telephoto for DX cameras. No painter chooses just one brush or colour. Build Quality and Handling That being said, you seem to be so confidant about your personal experience with your vintage lenses. One of the mysteries of our time Hmmm. DVIDS - Images - A full Apache attack helicopter battalion trains over Nikon D5500, 55-200mm VR II at 155mm, f/8 at 1/200. I don't see much wood grain on the fence in the foreground or the detail of any individual grass blade or tree leaf in the scenehttps://g2.img-dpreview.com/9E3562EE02C74EEBB0EB4427AF5E949C.jpg, In comparison, the Fuji still gets a bit of the grain on the painted boards on either the near or far building, https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9214413524/5730864586.jpg, Here the rocks pop out much more than the rocks on the lower right of your image, https://1.img-dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9214413524/3812771053.jpg, Here the individual grass blades appear more distinct on the lower right, https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9214413524/2992668073.jpg. As is the case with many modern AF lenses though, the price for this fairly fast AF performance is a relatively limited amount of travel on the manual focus ring, making manual focus a bit touchy. Paired with Nikon's basic 18-55mm kit lens, you would have a full range of focal lengths in two lenses, for half the overall price of the Nikon 18-200mm super-zoom. Use your imagination. Fisheye 0 matches. It's AF is nowhere near what this lens is able to offer. The 55-200 gets super close. Thanks! We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens. The picture results are the same! The Nikon 55-200mm VR isn't a perfect lens - there are some obvious issues with vignetting, and its focus mechanism is a bit of a step backwards from even slightly more expensive AF-S models. VR (Vibration Reduction) Image Stabilization. Best Nikon lenses I post a FF shot showing good performance on edges and corners at 100mm simple as ;-DThe focus is the building not the fence, which is in acceptable DOF in this particular shot. Good range, compact, light-weight zoom with VR! He is Digital Camera World's principal lens reviewer and has tested more primes and zooms than most people have had hot dinners! A very trying night: Nikon Z Mirrorless Talk Forum: Digital Photography Full-frame: No The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. Likewise, when subjects like birds are at reasonable distances, it can track them, too. I own this lens too and it is much sharper at 200 mm f/4.8. Thanx, I have taken a few thousand shots with this lens so far and am VERY happy with the results. I really like the first one.They show off the versatility of this zoom range as well. While the focus distance is the same, this lens can make slightly larger images at its closest focus distance than the previous 55-200mm VR. Not a true dealbreaker, but I find 100-200mm for example here is a photo I took at 78mm. Good smiles there, Dale, from land I know the kind of :). It's really great to have such offers. . All those other lenses are much larger full-frame lenses, and I just don't feel like carrying them. Going back to the 55-200, it works well on faster focusing newer bodies. A great camera is only as good as the lens you've chosen. The AFS seems a bit slower than the pro lenses but has been fast enough for portraits and photos of the family in good light. 2019 March: $349 at Amazon and at B&H Photo-Video. Please try again in a few minutes. Same applies to the 16-80mm which I have tried really disappointing lens, "The review does not tie up with my findings, so either his method is flawed or he has a bad copy of the lens", Or maybe you could be wrong? A-M stands for Auto-Manual Mode. Ben Broomfield 1.32K subscribers Subscribe 119K views 6 years ago Show Your Support - Like, Comment & Share - Samples Below! Filter size: 52mm 55 min ago Hi, I recently purchased a Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens. We offer you to compare any cameras to see which one that is most right for you. Used on a digital Nikon it gives angles of view similar to what an 85-300mm lens would give on a 35mm film camera. I sold it with the D40X most silly SLR camara ever made and 70-300VR to fund for my new 40D. Press the shutter halfways and wait a short bit before pressing it completely. Piles of garbage outside a McDonalds restaurant, Canon EOS Rebel T7 + Canon EF 16-35mm f/2,8 L USM, Canon EOS Rebel XTi + Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5,6 L IS USM, Nikon D300s + Canon EF TS-E 24mm f/3,5 L II, Nikon D300s + Nikon AF 105mm f/2,8 D Micro-Nikkor. Don't get me wrong, I love X-E2 as much as I say they should have kept the button placements for the X-E3. Before reading further, here are a few images taken with Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR that might inspire you. (purchased for $200), reviewed October 12th, 2012 Interesting lens, I would like something like that for my Sony E, the 55-200 is cheap but horrible and the new 70-350 is extremely expensive and f4.5-6.3. While we did find this lens a little tweaky to focus manually, it was otherwise a very nice-handling optic. On top of that. Crop from above image at 100%. Designed for DX (APS-C) DSLRs, the Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II has an effective zoom range of 82.5-300mm, neatly picking up the baton from Nikons DX 18-55mm kit zoom lenses. You made a claim about your Minolta lens and failed to actually provide any evidence to back it up. Unfortunately Sony seems to think that E APSC is done if ANY lens is available to cover a focal length, so we're unlikely to see additional cheaper telezooms. Here are first sample images of Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR II lens. AF-S f/4-5.6G ED (2015-2018), Sample ImagesIntro Specs Performance. Look at the sample photos. Also, this is not weather-resistant (WR) so you must store it more carefully. It didn't help that the foreground was generally underexposed for the scene due to the bright sky. This is a sharp, featherweight, well performing lens. Click on the image you want to know more about. C plus plus,"where the lens is most likely sharper and the aperture is wider. The Fuji has much better build quality while the Nikon is a plastic lens all the way to the mount. I had my camera set on continuous focus with face detect. Digital Camera World is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Aspherical IF Macro AF ~~470 This sample gallery, for example, looks typical of what Id get with the Nikon lens. Ken Rockwell. And so i'm looking at other camera brands for those kinds of shots. Best camera lenses to get VR is the nearest equivalent. The VR in this lens works really well at the slower shutter speeds and really seems to shine in the 1/5 to 1/30 range (I have not tested in in the slower range). Lateral chromatic aberration shows up at both ends of the zoom range, towards the edges and corners of the image frame, when uncorrected in-camera, as with early Nikon DSLRs. https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/02/the-long-awaited-scary-and-amazing-fuji-lens-teardown/. Must have been a glitch from posting from mobile. In addition it is not the vr2 but the old vr1. Obviously these are different beasts, with the Sigma being optimized to handle both the wide and tele ends of the focal-length spectrum. An optical glass developed by Nikon that is used with normal optical glass in telephoto lenses to obtain optimum correction of chromatic aberrations. Explore . Lens construction: 13 elements in 9 groups My sister in law bought the XC set, whereas I got the 18-55 and this baby mostly for the aperture ring.Years later I made a session with portraits of my daughter and compared the two lenses, just for the Fun of it. Here we collect sample pictures taken with the lens Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR . Even my vacation Nikkor 70-300G can match with it. Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR - Lensora G: Gelded for cost-reduction and removing compatibility with older cameras. Like I took this photo in almost the same place as the previous one, using a 80mm focal length on a full frame to make the entire row of trees feel close together. They are slowly transitioning to mirrorless. NIKKOR F-Mount DSLR Camera Lenses | Nikon If you read user reviews of the lens they are mostly positive, and there are other sources out there too. This is a very popular focal length range. For the "VFA" target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. I brought it in to have a quote for repair and it was about $200. Rear Barrel (between mount and zoom ring). Real world use always reveals more about a lens. :/. camera-original file. AF-S NIKKOR lenses feature Nikons Silent Wave Motor (SWM). What does matter is that the lens tube does not wiggle and wobbel as my 18-70 does, the latter is a dust eater because of that! Either way you are a new forum poster and you don't get the benefit of the doubt for not being a troll until you earn it. That is, if you hang a camera with the 55-200mm VR attached around your neck, the lens will maintain its zoom setting fairly well as long as it isn't jiggled too much. Excellent mid range lens. So why can I see from your post history you ragging on people's gear choices multiple times in the entire 48 hours you've been a forum member at DPreview, Like why are you trolling in the Fuji forum here https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4486491#forum-post-63909524, https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4485304#forum-post-63908053, And the Canon forum herehttps://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4485930?page=3#forum-post-63908437. I've used plenty of lenses Kurt has "tested" and most just don't add up to his assessment. I've sold plenty of photos taken with the XT2 XF55-200mm. Great sports, nature and portrait lens; there's no need to pay more. I'd estimate one or two extra F-stops when used shorter than 1/60. The stabilisation even seems better on the Fujithe Nikon seems to be not overly effective. So I have learned to actually dial down the shutter speed if I am forced to use the low speeds due to the lighting conditions - with some quite impressive results. I had to pay $200 at Fujifilm service for a set of lens element and AF module. The optical path is based on 13 elements in total and includes one ED (Extra-low Dispersion) element. It is quite versatile on my D300 and D200 cameras when I don't want to carry a heavy zoom. That being said looking at the dpreview gallery of the Fuji 55-200mm it's about what I thought it should be for a lens of that type (not that I'm going to buy it). Our articles will help you improve your knowledge. With that in mind, other questions like weight, lens sharpness, ability to print above A1 all require some thought and balance. (purchased for $90), reviewed October 19th, 2013 He is also an encyclopedia when it comes to all manner of cameras, camera holsters and bags, flashguns, tripods and heads, printers, papers and inks, and just about anything imaging-related. Yeah same problem I face with Sony. for the price, I'm not complaining. Visit our corporate site. Gelber Berg: Franconian landscape with dry grasland in the sunset. I need a macro lens just even non macro work cause none of my 7 lenses focus close. I prefer them by a mile. Personally its my travel/landscape zoom easy to fit in a bag and provides a lot of focal length/IQ for its size. AF operation isn't blazingly fast, but isn't bad either, it taking roughly a second for the lens to slew from closest focus to infinity. Nikon VR (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization provides 3.0 stops* of blur free handheld shooting, assuring dramatically sharper still images and HD video capture. The 55-300mm /4.5-5.6G ED VR was introduced in August 2010 as a new telephoto zoom lens companion to its 18-55mm wide-angle zoom lens. But I never liked pictures taken with this lens so after awhile I replaced it. Except for the electronics and the glass, it's all plastic. A solid performer that punches above its price pointI own the Tamron 70-300 VC, which has better IQ and markedly better image stabilization, but at the price of heft. Like many inexpensive zooms, it's sharper at shorter focal lengths than at long, the worst blur performance occurring at 135mm in our DxO tests. It is not a perfect lens by any means, but it does not have bad corners at 100mm (or 200 come to that). If you haven't helped yet, please do, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00. Sorry for convenience but with these lenses I got what is lacking If this is 6" (15cm) wide on your screen, the full image would print at 40 x 60" (1 x 1.5 meters)! Problem solved. The 55-200mm VR's chromatic aberration was also something of a pleasant surprise. While the 55-200mm VR's shading performance was well below average, geometric distortion is in line with other lenses sharing its focal length range. As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. I added no additional sharpening, having used quite a lot of lenses it is easy to say the resolution is good on that lens. I replaced mine with the 18-135 ONLY because of the lack of close focusing capability. You would be better off with a closeup lens. The Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR does pretty well in the sharpness department, particularly considering its selling price. If you want to focus by hand, set it to "M" for manual focus and turn the front ring yourself. This photo was with the Fuji 18-55 kit lens. Sharpness improves somewhat as you stop down, but images never get truly crisp. Because of its light weight, it's a bit hard to hold steady enough for the sharpest results it's capable of. Some cameras will only flash an "F - -" in the finder, while others will warn on the rear screen that the lens must be extended. To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows. Distortion is not large and can be fixed easily. Thank you! See camera and lens details1/4000s116mmf/4,5. FYI, the 70-300/4.5-5.6 II USM is a sub 400 bucks Lens, it was shortly around 470, 480 EUR here when it was being released. Browse 57 WEISSENBURG GUNZENHAUSEN photos and images available, or start a new search to explore more photos and images. Starting at 100mm also sucked. Lateral Color Fringes performance top. But if you break it, buy another one. Just confused why a sample gallery now or is this a Mark IiI missed? His expertise with equipment doesnt end there, though. It's a tiny vintage lens quite solid build that is pretty light and compact. Intro Nikon 55-200mm VR Lens Review w/ Sample Images! Look, it's not like I don't agree with the point that "not all new gear is the best gear." Subject movement is already there below 1/30. Putting that to one side, the Fuji lens is lacking entirely in contrast, which is way lower than the Vintage lens, no question it would lost to the Minolta in a 1/1 shoot out from what I can see. As shot on my D5500, there are none. The Nikon AF-S DX VR Zoom-NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED is an ideal telephoto zoom lens for those seeking a lightweight all-in-one lens or a companion lens for the 18-55mm kit lens that came with their camera.
Mzqlb960hajr-00007 Spec, Biolage Gelee Discontinued, How Much Is Hvac Trade School, Boycott Disney 2022 Johnny Depp, Articles N